![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
The Geometric Factors in the Generation of an Image of the Chest, using X-rays. |
||||
There are some assumptions in any reasoned argument about the chest X-ray. Some of these geometric factors are indicated below. The relation between density and tissue thickness.Put simply, we can equate the thickness of a soft tissue in the chest with its perceived density. (Here, we Radiologists mean whiteness on our negative images). The argument in simple reasoning is that the mathematical process involved in the assessment of radiation absortion, film blackening and perception is logarithmic. Those who are unfamiliar with this concept should consider compound interest or amortisation of a mortgage.
Light absorbed in a substance is a fixed ratio of incident radiation. Film blackening is proportional to this. Effectively, the reasoning concerning incremental steps in the processes of radiation absorption, film blackening and perception involves processes like: 'third of a third of a third'. Students of Calculus use incremental steps in their analysis. THE SMALLEST PERCEIVABLE SENSATION IS A FIXED RATIO ABOVE EXISTING LEVELS OF THAT SENSATION. (simplification of Webber-Fechner Law) All entirely normal anatomy within the patient's chest is soft tissue density and either contains some air or lies adjacent to some air. Any denser object will exceed the greyscale perception threshold and always be visible. Calcification is an example. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Since x-rays are shadow pictures, the direction of a beam imposes an obvious limitation on the final image. The generation of an X-ray image imposes a reduction in the potential sub-set of information to be stored in the image of the patient. The information is collected as the radiation beam passes through the patient and each point in the image records only that amount of Xray absorption in the direction of the beam. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
Return to Silhouette Intro |
![]() |
|
|
Ian Maddison, Nov 1994, revised Sept 2007